Shortly after Hunter Lightman joined OpenAI as a researcher in 2022, he watched his colleagues launch ChatGPT, one of many fastest-growing merchandise ever. In the meantime, Lightman quietly labored on a crew educating OpenAI’s fashions to resolve highschool math competitions.
Immediately that crew, often called MathGen, is taken into account instrumental to OpenAI’s industry-leading effort to create AI reasoning fashions: the core expertise behind AI brokers that may do duties on a pc like a human would.
“We had been attempting to make the fashions higher at mathematical reasoning, which on the time they weren’t excellent at,” Lightman instructed TechCrunch, describing MathGen’s early work.
OpenAI’s fashions are removed from excellent right now — the corporate’s newest AI programs nonetheless hallucinate and its brokers wrestle with advanced duties.
However its state-of-the-art fashions have improved considerably on mathematical reasoning. One among OpenAI’s fashions lately received a gold medal on the Worldwide Math Olympiad, a math competitors for the world’s brightest highschool college students. OpenAI believes these reasoning capabilities will translate to different topics, and in the end energy general-purpose brokers that the corporate has all the time dreamed of constructing.
ChatGPT was a cheerful accident — a lowkey analysis preview turned viral shopper enterprise — however OpenAI’s brokers are the product of a years-long, deliberate effort throughout the firm.
“Finally, you’ll simply ask the pc for what you want and it’ll do all of those duties for you,” mentioned OpenAI CEO Sam Altman on the firm’s first developer convention in 2023. “These capabilities are sometimes talked about within the AI subject as brokers. The upsides of this are going to be great.”
Techcrunch occasion
San Francisco
|
October 27-29, 2025
Whether or not brokers will meet Altman’s imaginative and prescient stays to be seen, however OpenAI shocked the world with the discharge of its first AI reasoning mannequin, o1, within the fall of 2024. Lower than a 12 months later, the 21 foundational researchers behind that breakthrough are probably the most extremely sought-after expertise in Silicon Valley.
Mark Zuckerberg recruited 5 of the o1 researchers to work on Meta’s new superintelligence-focused unit, providing some compensation packages north of $100 million. One among them, Shengjia Zhao, was lately named chief scientist of Meta Superintelligence Labs.
The reinforcement studying renaissance
The rise of OpenAI’s reasoning fashions and brokers are tied to a machine studying coaching method often called reinforcement studying (RL). RL gives suggestions to an AI mannequin on whether or not its decisions had been right or not in simulated environments.
RL has been used for many years. As an illustration, in 2016, a few 12 months after OpenAI was based in 2015, an AI system created by Google DeepMind utilizing RL, AlphaGo, gained world consideration after beating a world champion within the board recreation, Go.
Round that point, one in all OpenAI’s first workers, Andrej Karpathy, started pondering leverage RL to create an AI agent that might use a pc. However it could take years for OpenAI to develop the mandatory fashions and coaching strategies.
By 2018, OpenAI pioneered its first massive language mannequin within the GPT collection, pretrained on large quantities of web knowledge and a big clusters of GPUs. GPT fashions excelled at textual content processing, ultimately resulting in ChatGPT, however struggled with primary math.
It took till 2023 for OpenAI to realize a breakthrough, initially dubbed “Q*” after which “Strawberry,” by combining LLMs, RL, and a method known as test-time computation. The latter gave the fashions additional time and computing energy to plan and work by issues, verifying its steps, earlier than offering a solution.
This allowed OpenAI to introduce a brand new strategy known as “chain-of-thought” (CoT), which improved AI’s efficiency on math questions the fashions hadn’t seen earlier than.
“I may see the mannequin beginning to cause,” mentioned El Kishky. “It might discover errors and backtrack, it could get pissed off. It actually felt like studying the ideas of an individual.”
Although individually these strategies weren’t novel, OpenAI uniquely mixed them to create Strawberry, which straight led to the event of o1. OpenAI shortly recognized that the planning and truth checking skills of AI reasoning fashions might be helpful to energy AI brokers.
“We had solved an issue that I had been banging my head in opposition to for a few years,” mentioned Lightman. “It was probably the most thrilling moments of my analysis profession.”
Scaling reasoning
With AI reasoning fashions, OpenAI decided it had two new axes that may permit it to enhance AI fashions: utilizing extra computational energy through the post-training of AI fashions, and giving AI fashions extra time and processing energy whereas answering a query.
“OpenAI, as an organization, thinks lots about not simply the best way issues are, however the best way issues are going to scale,” mentioned Lightman.
Shortly after the 2023 Strawberry breakthrough, OpenAI spun up an “Brokers” crew led by OpenAI researcher Daniel Selsam to make additional progress on this new paradigm, two sources instructed TechCrunch. Though the crew was known as “Brokers,” OpenAI didn’t initially differentiate between reasoning fashions and brokers as we consider them right now. The corporate simply needed to make AI programs able to finishing advanced duties.
Finally, the work of Selsam’s Brokers crew turned half of a bigger venture to develop the o1 reasoning mannequin, with leaders together with OpenAI co-founder Ilya Sutskever, chief analysis officer Mark Chen, and chief scientist Jakub Pachocki.
OpenAI must divert treasured sources — primarily expertise and GPUs — to create o1. All through OpenAI’s historical past, researchers have needed to negotiate with firm leaders to acquire sources; demonstrating breakthroughs was a surefire method to safe them.
“One of many core parts of OpenAI is that every part in analysis is backside up,” mentioned Lightman. “After we confirmed the proof [for o1], the corporate was like, ‘This is smart, let’s push on it.’”
Some former workers say that the startup’s mission to develop AGI was the important thing consider reaching breakthroughs round AI reasoning fashions. By specializing in growing the smartest-possible AI fashions, moderately than merchandise, OpenAI was capable of prioritize o1 above different efforts. That kind of huge funding in concepts wasn’t all the time doable at competing AI labs.
The choice to strive new coaching strategies proved prescient. By late 2024, a number of main AI labs began seeing diminishing returns on fashions created by conventional pretraining scaling. Immediately, a lot of the AI subject’s momentum comes from advances in reasoning fashions.
What does it imply for an AI to “cause?”
In some ways, the purpose of AI analysis is to recreate human intelligence with computer systems. Because the launch of o1, ChatGPT’s UX has been crammed with extra human-sounding options similar to “pondering” and “reasoning.”
When requested whether or not OpenAI’s fashions had been really reasoning, El Kishky hedged, saying he thinks in regards to the idea when it comes to pc science.
“We’re educating the mannequin effectively expend compute to get a solution. So for those who outline it that method, sure, it’s reasoning,” mentioned El Kishky.
Lightman takes the strategy of specializing in the mannequin’s outcomes and never as a lot on the means or their relation to human brains.
“If the mannequin is doing laborious issues, then it’s doing no matter essential approximation of reasoning it wants to be able to try this,” mentioned Lightman. “We will name it reasoning, as a result of it appears like these reasoning traces, nevertheless it’s all only a proxy for attempting to make AI instruments which can be actually highly effective and helpful to lots of people.”
OpenAI’s researchers word individuals could disagree with their nomenclature or definitions of reasoning — and absolutely, critics have emerged — however they argue it’s much less necessary than the capabilities of their fashions. Different AI researchers are likely to agree.
Nathan Lambert, an AI researcher with the non-profit AI2, compares AI reasoning modes to airplanes in a weblog submit. Each, he says, are artifical programs impressed by nature — human reasoning and fowl flight, respectively — however they function by totally completely different mechanisms. That doesn’t make them any much less helpful, or any much less able to reaching comparable outcomes.
A gaggle of AI researchers from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google DeepMind agreed in a latest place paper that AI reasoning fashions should not nicely understood right now, and extra analysis is required. It might be too early to confidently declare what precisely is occurring inside them.
The subsequent frontier: AI brokers for subjective duties
The AI brokers available on the market right now work finest for well-defined, verifiable domains similar to coding. OpenAI’s Codex agent goals to assist software program engineers offload easy coding duties. In the meantime, Anthropic’s fashions have turn into significantly common in AI coding instruments like Cursor and Claude Code — these are a few of the first AI brokers that persons are prepared to pay up for.
Nevertheless, common objective AI brokers like OpenAI’s ChatGPT Agent and Perplexity’s Comet wrestle with lots of the advanced, subjective duties individuals wish to automate. When attempting to make use of these instruments for on-line procuring or discovering a long-term parking spot, I’ve discovered the brokers take longer than I’d like and make foolish errors.
Brokers are, in fact, early programs that can undoubtedly enhance. However researchers should first determine higher practice the underlying fashions to finish duties which can be extra subjective.
“Like many issues in machine studying, it’s an information downside,” mentioned Lightman, when requested in regards to the limitations of brokers on subjective duties. “Among the analysis I’m actually enthusiastic about proper now is determining practice on much less verifiable duties. We’ve got some leads on do these items.”
Noam Brown, an OpenAI researcher who helped create the IMO mannequin and o1, instructed TechCrunch that OpenAI has new general-purpose RL strategies which permit them to show AI fashions abilities that aren’t simply verified. This was how the corporate constructed the mannequin which achieved a gold medal at IMO, he mentioned.
OpenAI’s IMO mannequin was a more recent AI system that spawns a number of brokers, which then concurrently discover a number of concepts, after which select the very best reply. A lot of these AI fashions are rising in popularity; Google and xAI have lately launched state-of-the-art fashions utilizing this system.
“I believe these fashions will turn into extra succesful at math, and I believe they’ll get extra succesful in different reasoning areas as nicely,” mentioned Brown. “The progress has been extremely quick. I don’t see any cause to assume it’s going to decelerate.”
These strategies could assist OpenAI’s fashions turn into extra performant, good points that might present up within the firm’s upcoming GPT-5 mannequin. OpenAI hopes to claim its dominance over opponents with the launch of GPT-5, ideally providing one of the best AI mannequin to energy brokers for builders and shoppers.
However the firm additionally desires to make its merchandise easier to make use of. El Kishky says OpenAI desires to develop AI brokers that intuitively perceive what customers need, with out requiring them to pick particular settings. He says OpenAI goals to construct AI programs that perceive when to name up sure instruments, and the way lengthy to cause for.
These concepts paint an image of an final model of ChatGPT: an agent that may do something on the web for you, and perceive the way you need it to be achieved. That’s a a lot completely different product than what ChatGPT is right now, however the firm’s analysis is squarely headed on this course.
Whereas OpenAI undoubtedly led the AI {industry} a number of years in the past, the corporate now faces a tranche of worthy opponents. The query is not simply whether or not OpenAI can ship its agentic future, however can the corporate achieve this earlier than Google, Anthropic, xAI, or Meta beat them to it?
