Warning: The next article accommodates weapon spoilersWeapon star Amy Madigan reveals whether or not she’s going to return for a possible prequel. Director Zack Clegger’s horror movie explores the stunning lack of 17 youngsters from lecture rooms at Maybrook Elementary College. Since its premiere, the movie has change into a large industrial hit, with many audiences celebrating Madigan’s portrayal of Gladys.
It has been revealed that Gladys is behind each unforgettable occasion in Maybrook, together with the disappearing pupil, the weapon’s essential antagonist. She might captivate the character and viewers, however largely as a result of her bodily look and persona. Gladys is a scary factor Use magic to manage individuals at first look and run out of power.
In an interview with Leisure Weekly, Madigan defined that she is aware of how movie followers are receiving Gladys, stating that “it gave me a very good snicker,” and that she appreciates her efficiency being acknowledged. Learn a few of her feedback beneath:
The individuals I work with will ship me some hyperlinks and stuff like that. I felt that my work was actually good with this work, so it is actually good. I have been doing it for a very long time so to get this joyful factor and what I like…it is enjoyable. It gave me a very good snicker, however you may get off simply as shortly as you might be up. So you must take it with a grain of salt.
Madigan additionally revealed that she enjoys collaborating with Clegger, however relating to doubtlessly recreating her character within the weapons prequel, she defined that these choices may very well be made with out her. Nevertheless, Madigan shared, “I like Gladys,” including that he expects followers to put on her signature fashion. Learn extra of her feedback:
That is to not say I am discounting it, however on this enterprise, it isn’t as actual as it’s. I simply labored with Zack and had a extremely good time in his mind. It is actually a present of how the movie got here to be. Different issues need to do with all types of conversations and enterprise like that I’m by no means sensible. However you realize, I like Gladys so I will depart it there.
Individuals now have higher entry to these crimson wigs. I do know individuals need these glasses. I do know they do.
What does this imply for weapons?
Because the movie premiered, concepts started to type about Gladys and her means to govern individuals, and the prequel allowed followers to be introduced again to the theatre, considering how profitable the weapons are. Hypothesis in regards to the potential weapon prequel centered on Gladys has swirled, and as her chapters within the movie have been eliminated, audiences questioning what precisely her backstory is.
Within the thriller of the weapons, it’s revealed that Gladys is affected by an unknown sickness and that she plans to soak up power from Alex’s dad and mom. However when it failed, she resorted to utilizing her youngsters and did not thoughts hurting individuals who have been in her method, together with Justin.
Gladys’s story unveils some questions the prequel can reply, particularly whether or not she was a witch and what the supply of her tree and bell is. However maybe exploring her background may imply that Madigan will not be portraying her once more.
Our views on Gladys and the prequel to potential weapons
Madigan efficiently made Gladys right into a memorable character in weapons, which made her involvement in different initiatives appear important. Even when the primary half results in observe Gladys’ early years and actions, there could also be methods to include Madigan into the story.
It is nonetheless unclear whether or not he’ll soar into Gladys’ previous and create an attention-grabbing story or change into a much less scary character. Nevertheless, if one other weapons film on the coronary heart of her is made, it is laborious to think about anybody however Madigan in that function.

weapons
launch date
August 8, 2025
runtime
128 min
director
Zack Clegger
author
Zack Clegger
producer
Roy Lee, Miri Yun, JD Lifshitz


